De La Cruz Flores v. Peru

On March 27, 1990, Ms. María Teresa De La Cruz Flores was detained, charged with terrorism and later prosecuted by a court composed of "faceless" judges and sentenced to twenty years imprisonment. On February 19, 2003, newly enacted Peruvian laws established that, within sixty working days from this legislation entering into force, the National Terrorism Chamber should gradually annul the judgment and the oral proceeding and declare the absence of grounds for the charge in criminal trials for offenses of terrorism conducted before secret judges or prosecutors. However, at the date the Commission submitted its application to the Court, Ms. De La Cruz Flores remained in detention. The Court found that the State violated the American Convention on Human Rights. 

Case Summary: De La Cruz-Flores v. Peru, Case Summary

Year: 
2004
Country: 
Did the State Accept International Responsibility?: 
No
Did the State Raise Preliminary Objections?: 
No
Separate Opinions: 
Case Summary: 
Yes

Find A Case

Advanced Search

Try Advanced Search for more search options.

Contact Information

IACHR Project
Contact Information

Loyola Law School

919 Albany St.

Los Angeles, CA 90015

Find us on Facebook!