This case is about a judge in Chile who was sanctioned for having written an academic paper criticizing the judiciary for the way it had approached the transition from dictatorship to democracy, and for having brought the paper to the attention of the Supreme Court. The Court found Chile in violation of the American Convention.
Case Summary: Urrutia Laubreaux v. Chile
Year
2020
Country
Violations Against The Inter-American Convention On Human Rights
Did the State Raise Preliminary Objections?
Judges
Separate Opinions
Reparations
Case Summary
Yes